Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Cell Rep Med ; 4(1): 100893, 2023 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2165955

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 convalescent plasmas (CCPs) are chosen for plasma therapy based on neutralizing titers and anti-Spike immunoglobulin levels. However, CCP characteristics that promote SARS-CoV-2 control are complex and incompletely defined. Using an in vivo imaging approach, we demonstrate that CCPs with low neutralizing (ID50 ≤ 1:250), but moderate to high Fc-effector activity, in contrast to those with poor Fc function, delay mortality and/or improve survival of SARS-CoV-2-challenged K18-hACE2 mice. The impact of innate immune cells on CCP efficacy depended on their residual neutralizing activity. Fractionation of a selected CCP revealed that IgG and Ig(M + A) were required during therapy, but the IgG fraction alone sufficed during prophylaxis. Finally, despite reduced neutralization, ancestral SARS-CoV-2-elicited CCPs significantly delayed Delta and Beta-induced mortality suggesting that Fc-effector functions contribute to immunity against VOCs. Thus, Fc activity of CCPs provide a second line of defense when neutralization is compromised and can serve as an important criterion for CCP selection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , Mice , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Treatment Outcome , Immunoglobulin G
2.
Cell Rep ; 34(9): 108790, 2021 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1077816

ABSTRACT

Characterization of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent of COVID-19, is essential to help control the infection. The neutralization activity of plasma from patients with COVID-19 decreases rapidly during the first weeks after recovery. However, the specific role of each immunoglobulin isotype in the overall neutralizing capacity is still not well understood. In this study, we select plasma from a cohort of convalescent patients with COVID-19 and selectively deplete immunoglobulin A, M, or G before testing the remaining neutralizing capacity of the depleted plasma. We find that depletion of immunoglobulin M is associated with the most substantial loss of virus neutralization, followed by immunoglobulin G. This observation may help design efficient antibody-based COVID-19 therapies and may also explain the increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 of autoimmune patients receiving therapies that impair the production of immunoglobulin M (IgM).


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Canada/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Immunization, Passive/methods , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult , COVID-19 Serotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL